Comparison

Scleral lenses vs piggyback contact lenses

A piggyback system stacks a small rigid lens on top of a soft lens. It's an older, well-established way to make rigid lenses more comfortable on an irregular cornea. Here's how it compares with going straight to a scleral lens.

By the Scleral Lens Team · Updated October 2, 2026 · 10 published sources cited

The short answer

A piggyback system is a rigid gas permeable lens worn on top of a soft lens. The soft lens cushions the cornea and helps the rigid lens stay centered, while the rigid lens does the focusing. It can work well for people who see clearly in rigid lenses but can't tolerate them. A scleral lens solves the same problem in a single lens that doesn't touch the cornea. No trial has compared the two directly, so the choice rests on your cornea, your comfort, and your fitter's judgment.

Key points

  • Piggyback means a rigid lens on top of a soft lens: two lenses per eye.
  • Small studies show better comfort than rigid lenses alone, with similar or better vision.
  • Stacking two lenses reduces the oxygen reaching the cornea, so lens materials matter.
  • A scleral lens does the same job with one lens that vaults the cornea.
  • No head-to-head study compares piggyback and scleral lenses.

What a piggyback system is

A piggyback system is two contact lenses on the same eye: a soft lens sits on the cornea, and a small rigid gas permeable (RGP) lens sits on top of it. The rigid lens gives a smooth focusing surface over an irregular cornea, just as a rigid lens alone would. The soft lens underneath acts as a cushion.

In a study of 29 eyes of 16 people with keratoconus who couldn’t wear rigid lenses, the reasons for using a piggyback system were to stabilize the rigid lens, to improve comfort, and to protect the cone from the rigid lens rubbing on it.[1]

A scleral lens solves the same problem differently. It’s one large rigid lens that rests on the white of the eye and vaults over the cornea, with a layer of saline between the lens and the cornea. Nothing rests on the cone at all.

Side by side

Piggyback (rigid on soft)[1][4] Scleral lens[9]
What it is Two lenses: a soft lens with a small rigid lens on top One large rigid lens
Rests on The cornea, cushioned by the soft lens The white of the eye (sclera)
Touches the cornea Yes, through the soft lens No. Vaults over it with saline
Vision Similar to a rigid lens alone, sometimes better because the lens centers more steadily Usually sharp, even in advanced keratoconus
Comfort Better than a rigid lens alone for many people Often comfortable once fitted
Oxygen to the cornea Reduced by stacking two lenses. High-oxygen materials help Passes through one lens and the saline layer under it
Handling Two lenses per eye, often with two care systems One lens per eye, but larger and needs filling with saline
Fitting Uses standard soft and rigid lens designs Custom lens, often several visits
Who it suits People who see well in rigid lenses but find them uncomfortable or unstable People who need sharp vision and can’t tolerate lenses on the cornea, including advanced cases

What the research on piggyback lenses shows

The evidence is a handful of small studies, mostly older, all in keratoconus.

  • Vision and comfort. In the 29-eye study above, vision was significantly better than in glasses for every patient. Compared with rigid lenses alone, vision improved in 89.7% of eyes and was unchanged in the rest. Most people wore the piggyback system for a limited time (on average 6 months) and then tolerated the rigid lens alone, except two patients.[1]
  • Longer-term use. A US clinic reviewed the charts of 205 people with keratoconus and found 16 wearing piggyback systems. Their vision and wearing time were stable or better compared with when they wore rigid lenses alone. Two developed new blood vessels growing into the cornea and one developed giant papillary conjunctivitis, an allergic-type reaction under the eyelid. Corneal problems present before piggyback wear all resolved.[2]
  • People who couldn’t wear rigid lenses. In a Japanese study of 11 people with keratoconus who couldn’t wear hard lenses because of pain or poor fit, 10 were successfully treated with a piggyback system. One needed a corneal transplant.[3]
  • Compared with a hybrid lens. A small study of 30 eyes compared piggyback lenses with a hybrid lens over six months and found no difference in markers of surface inflammation or cell changes.[6]

The oxygen question

Stacking two lenses means less oxygen reaches the cornea. A lab study measured the oxygen level under several soft-plus-rigid combinations on normal eyes and found it was between 6.9% and 11.2%, expressed as the equivalent percentage of oxygen in the air. Among the 10 patients the same clinic followed after dispensing, none showed signs of corneal swelling.[4] Another lab study found that combining the highest-oxygen soft and rigid materials gave the smallest increase in the cornea’s oxygen demand, and that blinking made no measurable difference to the cornea’s oxygen supply under piggyback systems.[5] That’s why the choice of materials matters so much for a piggyback fit.

How common each one is

Piggyback systems are a niche option. At one US academic eye clinic, the lenses prescribed to people with keratoconus in 2020 were 60% corneal rigid lenses, 22% scleral lenses, 12% soft toric lenses, 5% hybrid lenses and 1% soft spherical lenses. Piggyback systems weren’t listed as a category. The people wearing scleral lenses had the steepest, most advanced corneas.[8]

Piggyback systems can also involve a scleral lens. In one case report, a child who couldn’t tolerate a scleral lens wore a soft lens, then a soft lens under a scleral lens, and eventually a scleral lens alone.[7]

What scleral lenses offer, and where they fall short

A scleral lens avoids the two biggest drawbacks of a piggyback system: there’s only one lens per eye, and nothing presses on the cone. In a study of 157 keratoconic eyes, average corrected vision improved from 0.50 logMAR in glasses (about 20/63) to 0.08 logMAR in scleral lenses (about 20/24).[9]

Questions to ask your fitter

  • Do I see well in a rigid lens alone? Is comfort the main problem, or vision?
  • Would a piggyback system let me keep using lenses I already know how to handle?
  • What materials would you use, and how much oxygen will my cornea get?
  • How would cleaning work with two different lenses?
  • If piggyback doesn’t work, what’s the next step: a hybrid lens, a scleral lens, or something else?

See also scleral vs RGP lenses, scleral vs hybrid lenses, and our keratoconus page.

Common questions

Is a piggyback lens the same as a hybrid lens?

No. A hybrid lens is a single lens with a rigid center and a soft skirt bonded together. A piggyback system is two separate lenses, a soft one with a rigid one on top. A small study comparing the two in keratoconus found similar effects on the eye's surface over six months.

Do I need two cleaning systems for piggyback lenses?

Usually you're caring for two different lens types, and soft and rigid lenses often use different solutions. Your fitter will tell you exactly which products to use for each lens.

Can a piggyback system be a step toward scleral lenses?

Sometimes. One case report describes a child who moved from a soft lens to a soft-plus-scleral piggyback system and then to a scleral lens alone. It's a single case, so ask your fitter whether that kind of step-by-step approach makes sense for you.

Is piggyback wear temporary?

It can be. In one study, most people wore the piggyback system for a few months and were then able to wear the rigid lens alone. Others wear piggyback systems for years.

Keep reading

Scleral lenses vs rigid gas permeable (corneal) lenses

A corneal rigid gas permeable (RGP) lens is small and sits directly on the cornea. A scleral lens is larger, rests on the white of the eye, and arches over the cornea on a layer of saline. In a randomized trial of people already doing well in corneal RGPs, scleral lenses were rated more comfortable, but vision was about the same and preferences were split. If your RGP is comfortable and you see well, there may be no reason to switch.

Scleral lenses vs hybrid contact lenses

A hybrid lens has a rigid gas permeable center bonded to a soft outer skirt, and it rests on the cornea. A scleral lens is entirely rigid, larger, and rests on the white of the eye without touching the cornea. Studies show both can sharpen vision a great deal in keratoconus. Hybrids can feel and handle more like a soft lens, but discomfort is a common reason people stop wearing them.

Scleral lenses vs soft contact lenses

A soft lens drapes over the cornea and largely takes on its shape, so it can't smooth out much irregularity. A scleral lens holds its own shape over a layer of saline, which is why it can restore vision on a very irregular cornea. Specialty soft lenses for keratoconus are thicker and custom-made, and small studies show they can work well for some people, especially those who can't tolerate rigid lenses. For an ordinary prescription with a healthy cornea, a regular soft lens is usually the simpler choice.

Scleral lenses vs Intacs and other corneal ring segments

Intacs and other intracorneal ring segments are a surgical option that flattens and regularizes a keratoconic cornea. They can improve vision without correction and with glasses, but many people still need a contact lens afterward. Scleral lenses usually give sharper corrected vision with no surgery, but they're a daily routine. Neither one is designed to stop keratoconus from progressing. Which fits you depends on your cornea, your tolerance for lenses, and your surgeon's and fitter's assessment.

Sources

  1. Sengor T, Kurna SA, Aki S, Ozkurt Y. High Dk piggyback contact lens system for contact lens-intolerant keratoconus patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:331-335. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S16727 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  2. Yeung K, Eghbali F, Weissman BA. Clinical experience with piggyback contact lens systems on keratoconic eyes. J Am Optom Assoc. 1995;66(9):539-543. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  3. Tsubota K, Mashima Y, Murata H, Yamada M. A piggyback contact lens for the correction of irregular astigmatism in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(1):134-139. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31374-1 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  4. Giasson CJ, Perreault N, Brazeau D. Oxygen tension beneath piggyback contact lenses and clinical outcomes of users. CLAO J. 2001;27(3):144-150. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  5. Florkey LN, Fink BA, Mitchell GL, Hill RM. Corneal oxygen uptake associated with piggyback contact lens systems. Cornea. 2007;26(3):324-335. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31802cd8dc pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. Acar BT, Vural ET, Acar S. Effects of contact lenses on the ocular surface in patients with keratoconus: piggyback versus ClearKone hybrid lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38(1):43-48. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31823ff181 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. Murphy DA, Samples JS, Zepeda EM, Riaz KM. Progression from soft lens to piggyback soft-scleral contact lens system to facilitate scleral lens use in a pediatric patient. Eye Contact Lens. 2021;47(7):426-428. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000776 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  8. Scanzera AC, Deeley M, Joslin C, McMahon TT, Shorter E. Contact lens prescribing trends for keratoconus at an academic medical center: increased utilization of scleral lenses for severe disease. Eye Contact Lens. 2022;48(2):58-62. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000869 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. Fuller DG, Wang Y. Safety and efficacy of scleral lenses for keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(9):741-748. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001578 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  10. Macedo-de-Araújo RJ, van der Worp E, González-Méijome JM. A one-year prospective study on scleral lens wear success. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(6):553-561. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2019.10.140 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Last updated October 2, 2026. Found an error or a newer study? Let us know and we'll correct the page.