Comparison

Scleral lenses vs Intacs and other corneal ring segments

Ring segments are small implants placed inside the cornea to flatten the cone. Scleral lenses leave the cornea alone and correct vision from the outside. Here is how the two compare, including how often people end up using both.

By the Scleral Lens Team · Updated October 2, 2026 · 12 published sources cited

The short answer

Intacs and other intracorneal ring segments are a surgical option that flattens and regularizes a keratoconic cornea. They can improve vision without correction and with glasses, but many people still need a contact lens afterward. Scleral lenses usually give sharper corrected vision with no surgery, but they're a daily routine. Neither one is designed to stop keratoconus from progressing. Which fits you depends on your cornea, your tolerance for lenses, and your surgeon's and fitter's assessment.

Key points

  • Ring segments are a surgical implant. Scleral lenses are a removable device.
  • In one small comparison, scleral lenses improved corrected vision more than ring segments did.
  • Many eyes still need a lens after ring segments, often a scleral lens.
  • Ring segment problems include segment migration, exposure, and removal.
  • Neither treatment is designed to stop progression. That's cross-linking's job.

What each one is

Intracorneal ring segments are small, curved implants that a surgeon places in tunnels inside the cornea, the clear front window of the eye. They flatten and reshape a cone-shaped cornea so it’s more regular. Intacs is one brand. Others include Ferrara rings, KeraRings and MyoRings, and some surgeons now use ring segments made from donor corneal tissue instead of plastic.[2]

In the US, the FDA approved Intacs for keratoconus in 2004 through a Humanitarian Device Exemption. The approval covered adults 21 and over who could no longer see adequately with contact lenses or glasses, who had a clear central cornea and enough corneal thickness (at least 450 microns at the incision site), and for whom a transplant was the only remaining option. The stated goal was to restore functional vision and possibly defer a transplant.[1]

A scleral lens is a large, rigid contact lens. It rests on the white of the eye (the sclera), arches over the cornea without touching it, and holds a layer of saline in front of it. The smooth front surface of the lens replaces the cornea’s irregular one optically. Nothing about the cornea itself changes.

Side by side

Ring segments (Intacs and similar)[2][3] Scleral lens[11]
What it is A surgical implant inside the cornea A custom lens you put in each morning and take out at night
How it helps Flattens and regularizes the cornea Masks the irregular cornea with a smooth optical surface
Vision Improves vision without correction and with glasses for many people. Many still need a lens afterward Usually gives sharp corrected vision, even in advanced keratoconus
Reversible? Segments can be repositioned or removed, which is a second procedure Yes. Stop wearing it
Daily effort None once healed Insertion, removal, cleaning, and filling every day
Main risks Segment migration or exposure, thinning over the segment, infection, a second procedure Handling difficulty, fogging, infection risk shared with all contact lenses
Stops progression? Not designed to. Often combined with cross-linking No
Who it suits People who can’t tolerate contact lenses and have no central scarring Most people with keratoconus who can’t see well in glasses, including advanced cases

What the research on ring segments shows

Vision usually improves, but results vary. A 2026 systematic review pooled 17 studies covering 544 eyes treated with Intacs for keratoconus. It found consistent improvements in vision and corneal shape, but called device-related complications “an important limitation”, including segment migration, extrusion, and the need for repositioning or removal.[3]

Long-term follow-up is small but encouraging. A Greek study followed 17 eyes of 15 people for about five years. Before surgery, all had uncorrected vision of 20/50 or worse. At the last visit, 10 of the 17 eyes (59%) saw 20/50 or better without correction, 10 eyes gained between one and eight lines of vision with glasses, and one eye lost three lines. There were no late complications in that group.[4]

Complications can be significant in some series. In a US study of a modified technique in 20 eyes with moderate to advanced keratoconus, 6 eyes developed segment exposure because the cornea thinned over the implant, one had a perforation into the front chamber of the eye, and one developed a dense corneal infiltrate.[5] A 2025 review notes that newer laser-created tunnels reduce complications compared with older mechanical methods, and that long-term serious adverse events are uncommon.[2]

Quality of life can be similar. A cross-sectional study of 67 people with moderate to severe keratoconus found similar overall vision-related quality of life in those using glasses, corneal rigid lenses, or ring segments. The ring segment group scored higher on two specific areas, social functioning and dependency, than the rigid lens group.[10] A snapshot like this can’t show cause and effect.

When people use both

Ring segments and scleral lenses aren’t always alternatives. Many people have ring segments and later wear a lens.

  • After ring segments, many eyes still need a lens. In a Brazilian study of 55 eyes with advanced keratoconus, 7 of 13 eyes (53.85%) that had ring segments were later fitted with a scleral lens to improve vision. In the same study, eyes fitted with a scleral lens without surgery gained significantly more corrected vision than eyes that had ring segments.[6] It’s a small, retrospective study, so treat it as a signal rather than proof.
  • Lenses can rescue a disappointing result. In a study of 19 people fitted with contact lenses after ring segments, all of whom had been contact lens intolerant before surgery, 17 achieved good or medium comfort. Two (10.5%) didn’t and went on to have a transplant.[7] In 9 eyes of 6 people unhappy with their vision after ring segments, mini-scleral lenses improved average corrected vision from 0.38 to 0.09 logMAR (roughly 20/48 to 20/25).[8]
  • Scleral lens wear over ring segments looks stable. A study of 65 people with keratoconus, some with ring segments and some without, found vision stayed stable over a year of daily scleral lens wear in both groups, with small measurable changes in corneal shape.[9]

What scleral lenses offer, and where they fall short

In a study of 157 keratoconic eyes, average corrected vision improved from 0.50 logMAR in glasses (about 20/63) to 0.08 logMAR in scleral lenses (about 20/24).[11] That’s without any surgery, and the lens can be refitted if the cornea changes.

Questions to ask your eye doctor

  • Is my cornea a good shape for ring segments? Is there scarring in the center?
  • What vision do you expect after ring segments, with and without glasses or lenses?
  • How often do your patients need a segment repositioned or removed?
  • Is my keratoconus progressing? Should I have cross-linking first or at the same time?
  • If I try a scleral lens first and it works, is there still a reason to have ring segments?

For more on the other options, see scleral lenses vs cross-linking, scleral lenses vs corneal transplant, and our keratoconus page.

Common questions

Can I wear a scleral lens after Intacs?

Often, yes. Because a scleral lens vaults over the cornea instead of resting on it, it can be fitted over a cornea with ring segments in it. Small studies and case reports describe good vision with scleral lenses after ring segments, including in people who couldn't tolerate other lenses. Your fitter will check clearance over the segments carefully.

Will Intacs mean I don't need contact lenses?

Some people see well enough afterward with glasses or no correction, but many don't. In one small comparison, more than half the eyes that had ring segments were later fitted with a scleral lens to improve vision further. Ask your surgeon what result is realistic for your cornea.

Can Intacs be removed?

Ring segments can be repositioned or removed if problems develop. Reviews list the need for repositioning or removal among the device-related complications. Ask your surgeon how often they see this and what happens to vision if a segment is taken out.

Do Intacs or scleral lenses stop keratoconus from getting worse?

Neither is designed to. If your keratoconus is progressing, cross-linking is the treatment aimed at stopping that. Some surgeons combine ring segments with cross-linking.

Who is a candidate for Intacs?

The original US approval was for adults 21 and over with a clear central cornea, enough corneal thickness where the segment goes in, and who could no longer see adequately with glasses or contact lenses. Your corneal surgeon will tell you whether you're a candidate.

Keep reading

Scleral lenses vs corneal cross-linking

Cross-linking is a procedure that strengthens the cornea to stop keratoconus from progressing. It doesn't usually restore clear vision. Scleral lenses give clear vision, but they don't stop the disease. So they aren't alternatives: if your keratoconus is getting worse, cross-linking is the treatment designed for that, and a scleral lens (or another lens) is how you see well before and after.

Scleral lenses vs corneal transplant

For many people with an irregular cornea, a well-fitted scleral lens gives clear enough vision that a transplant can be delayed or avoided. In one clinic, most eyes with severe keratoconus that would otherwise have been referred for surgery did well in scleral lenses instead. A transplant is still the answer when the cornea is too scarred or cloudy for a lens to help, or when lenses can't be worn. And a transplant doesn't always end lens wear: many people need specialty lenses afterward.

Scleral lenses vs glasses for keratoconus

Glasses correct regular nearsightedness and astigmatism, but keratoconus makes the cornea irregular, and a spectacle lens can't fully correct that. In early keratoconus, glasses may be all you need. As the cornea becomes more irregular, a rigid lens such as a scleral lens usually gives much sharper vision, because its smooth surface replaces the cornea's uneven one. Glasses stay useful as a backup for everyone. Your eye doctor can tell you how much vision you'd gain.

Scleral lenses vs rigid gas permeable (corneal) lenses

A corneal rigid gas permeable (RGP) lens is small and sits directly on the cornea. A scleral lens is larger, rests on the white of the eye, and arches over the cornea on a layer of saline. In a randomized trial of people already doing well in corneal RGPs, scleral lenses were rated more comfortable, but vision was about the same and preferences were split. If your RGP is comfortable and you see well, there may be no reason to switch.

Sources

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Humanitarian Device Exemption H040002: INTACS Prescription Inserts for Keratoconus (Addition Technology). Decision date July 26, 2004. accessdata.fda.gov
  2. Hayat UK, Shiwani HA, Memon D, Walkden A. Intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus: a narrative literature review. Clin Ophthalmol. 2025;19:2249-2257. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S520174 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  3. Czuj-Porębska W, Wylęgała A, Martyka A, et al. Clinical outcomes and complications after INTACS implantation in keratoconus: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2026;15(11):4076. doi:10.3390/jcm15114076 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  4. Kymionis GD, Siganos CS, Tsiklis NS, et al. Long-term follow-up of Intacs in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(2):236-244. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.10.041 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  5. Kanellopoulos AJ, Pe LH, Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED. Modified intracorneal ring segment implantations (INTACS) for the management of moderate to advanced keratoconus: efficacy and complications. Cornea. 2006;25(1):29-33. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000167883.63266.60 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. Rocha G, Vieira BV, Mendes BMS, et al. Visual outcomes in advanced keratoconus using different strategies: scleral lens, intracorneal ring segment and lamellar keratoplasty. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(4):1563-1570. doi:10.1177/1120672121994731 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. Moreira LB, Bardal RA, Crisigiovanni LR. Contact lenses fitting after intracorneal ring segments implantation in keratoconus. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2013;76(4):215-217. doi:10.1590/S0004-27492013000400004 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  8. Alipour F, Rahimi F, Hashemian MN, et al. Mini-scleral contact lens for management of poor visual outcomes after intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation in keratoconus. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11(3):252-257. doi:10.4103/2008-322X.188400 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. Serramito M, Privado-Aroco A, Carracedo G. One-year impact of scleral lens wear on corneal morphology in keratoconus with and without intracorneal ring segment. Healthcare (Basel). 2026;14(1):131. doi:10.3390/healthcare14010131 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  10. Kangari H, Mohaghegh S, Bamdad S. Quality of life in keratoconus patients; a comparison between spectacle, rigid gas-permeable lens, and corneal stromal ring segment implantation. Beyoglu Eye J. 2025;10(2):79-84. doi:10.14744/bej.2025.86648 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  11. Fuller DG, Wang Y. Safety and efficacy of scleral lenses for keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(9):741-748. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001578 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  12. Kreps EO, Pesudovs K, Claerhout I, Koppen C. Mini-scleral lenses improve vision-related quality of life in keratoconus. Cornea. 2021;40(7):859-864. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002518 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Last updated October 2, 2026. Found an error or a newer study? Let us know and we'll correct the page.