For eye doctors

Scleral lenses and corneal neovascularization

Scleral lenses can contribute to new corneal vessels through hypoxia or limbal pressure, and in some diseased eyes they have been part of making vessels regress. What the evidence shows on both sides.

By the Scleral Lens Team · Updated October 2, 2026 · 11 published sources cited

The short answer

New corneal vessels in a scleral wearer usually point to hypoxia, limbal bearing, or a tight landing zone, or to the underlying disease. A practitioner survey estimated that 0.53% of wearers stopped lens wear in a year because of neovascularization, so it is uncommon but real. Document vessels at baseline, report new or advancing vessels to the fitter promptly, and treat inflammation. In severe surface disease, small case series report regression of existing vessels with PROSE, including when used to deliver topical bevacizumab.

Key points

  • In a survey covering 72,605 wearers, 0.53% discontinued over one year because of corneal neovascularization.
  • Reviews link lens-related vessels to hypoxia, limbal bearing, tight landing zones, poor compliance, and overwear.
  • Superficial vessels are generally linked to hypoxia; deeper, larger vessels may point to inflammation or the underlying disease.
  • In 13 PROSE patients given topical bevacizumab in the device reservoir, vessels regressed in 12 (92%).
  • Baseline photography makes later change much easier to judge.

How often it ends lens wear

The largest population-level estimate comes from a survey of scleral lens practitioners covering 72,605 wearers. Over one year, 0.53% discontinued wear because of corneal neovascularization, compared with 1.2% for corneal edema, 0.45% for microbial keratitis, and 0.20% for limbal stem cell deficiency. These are period prevalences of stopping wear, not incidence rates of vessels.[1] Many eyes with some vascular change continue in a modified lens and would not appear in that figure.

Why vessels develop under a scleral lens

A 2025 review describes lens-related vascularization as growth from the limbal plexus associated with prolonged hypoxia, inflammation, infection, trauma, poor compliance, and poorly fitted lenses, including limbal bearing, as well as overwear or extended wear.[2] It distinguishes superficial vessels, generally linked to hypoxia, from deeper and larger vessels that may indicate inflammation from the underlying disease.[2]

Oxygen. The lens and reservoir sit in series over the cornea. Theoretical calculations in 2012 predicted that most scleral lens systems of the time would produce some hypoxic swelling and recommended high-Dk materials, thin lenses, and limited clearance.[4] The peripheral cornea is not spared: in 10 healthy adults, stromal swelling was as large near the limbus as centrally, and rose with reservoir thickness.[5] A single small limbal fenestration reduced peripheral swelling near the fenestration in 9 healthy participants.[6]

Pressure. The review lists limbal bearing and tight landing zones as triggers.[2] In a single-subject OCT angiography pilot, perilimbal vascular flow interruption grew from 0% to 25% to 75% as lens sagittal height increased.[8] In 27 eyes with limbal stem cell deficiency wearing scleral lenses, LSCD stage worsened in 44.4%, and imaging in 5 eyes showed limbal compression and delayed fluorescein filling, which the authors suggest reflects limbal hypoxia.[7]

The underlying disease. Vascularization is a common repair pathway in severe corneal and ocular surface disease, and exposure keratopathy is among the conditions the 2025 review lists as prone to it.[2] Limbal stem cell deficiency brings conjunctival epithelium and vessels onto the cornea by itself.[9] In these eyes, new vessels may not be lens-related at all.

What to do at your visits

A 2022 review of scleral lens assessment notes that an improperly fitted lens can cause complications ranging from swelling and redness to infiltrates or neovascularization, and recommends documenting slit lamp findings at baseline for comparison, with photography wherever possible.[3] In practice:

  1. Baseline: photograph the limbus in all quadrants before the fit, noting existing vessels and ghost vessels, and their depth.
  2. Follow-up: compare against the photographs, looking for new vessels, extension toward the visual axis, active (perfused) versus ghost vessels, and associated haze, lipid, or edema.
  3. Correlate with the lens: check whether vessels sit under a zone of limbal bearing or a tight landing quadrant, and note wear hours, sleeping in lenses, and any change in lens or solution.
  4. Report new or advancing vessels to the fitter promptly, with photographs.

What the fitter can change

The review describes refitting from older polymethyl methacrylate or low-permeability materials to modern high-Dk materials, which it reports has reversed vascularization in some cases, along with optimizing lens and reservoir thickness to limit hypoxia and relieving limbal bearing or landing zone pressure.[2] For signs of hypoxia, a 2018 review also lists shortening the wear schedule and adding fenestrations.[9]

When scleral devices are part of treatment

In severe surface disease, a well-fitted device can be part of controlling vessels rather than causing them.

  • PROSE as a drug-delivery system: in a retrospective, non-comparative series of 13 sequential patients at one center, followed for a mean of 5.1 years, preservative-free bevacizumab was added to the PROSE reservoir. Vessels regressed in 12 (92%) and best-corrected acuity improved in 10 (77%). Vessels progressed in one eye after bevacizumab stopped, and no ophthalmic or systemic complications were reported. Diagnoses included Stevens-Johnson syndrome (7), ocular GVHD (2), and corneal transplant (2).[10] Bevacizumab use on the cornea is off-label, and one author was employed by the PROSE provider during the study period.[10]
  • PROSE alone: a report of two patients (four eyes) with Stevens-Johnson syndrome or TEN described regression of vessels and clearing of opacity with PROSE, in devices that all had back-surface channeled haptics. The authors call for more research into which design features matter.[11]

Common questions

Should a patient with new vessels stop wearing the lens?

That depends on how far the vessels extend, how fast they are advancing, and what the lens is doing for the eye. Report new or advancing vessels to the fitter promptly so the fit and oxygen supply can be reviewed. In a practitioner survey, 0.53% of wearers stopped over a year because of neovascularization, which means most eyes with some vascular change continue in a modified lens.

Can a refit make lens-related vessels regress?

A 2025 review reports that refitting from older low-permeability materials to modern high-Dk materials has reversed vascularization in some cases, and recommends optimizing lens and reservoir thickness and relieving limbal or landing zone pressure. Regression of established vessels is not guaranteed.

Is bevacizumab in a PROSE device an approved treatment?

No. Topical bevacizumab is used off-label for corneal neovascularization. The PROSE data come from one center's retrospective series of 13 patients. Treatment decisions belong to the cornea specialist and the PROSE or scleral lens team together.

Do scleral lenses help vessels regress in surface disease?

In selected cases. Beyond the bevacizumab series, a report of two patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome or TEN described regression of vessels and clearing of opacity over time with PROSE, in devices with channeled haptics. Two cases can't tell you how often this happens.

Keep reading

Limbal and conjunctival findings in scleral lens wearers

A scleral lens bears on the conjunctiva, so some landing zone change is expected: a faint impression ring after removal usually fades within hours. Sectoral or circumferential blanching during wear with rebound hyperemia after removal, edge impingement, quadrant staining, or limbal staining point to a fit problem that the fitter can usually correct with design changes. Imaging studies show measurable conjunctival vascular and thickness changes under the landing zone, of uncertain long-term significance. Limbal compromise in eyes with limbal stem cell deficiency needs closer attention.

Monitoring corneal edema in scleral lens wearers

In healthy corneas, modern high-Dk scleral lenses worn open-eye cause small swelling, roughly 1 to 2% in short-term studies, that resolves after removal. The concern is eyes with reduced endothelial reserve: penetrating keratoplasty grafts, Fuchs dystrophy, and other low cell counts, where swelling is larger, more variable, and has ended treatment in some patients. Measure pachymetry with the same device before wear and immediately after removal, and send any rise or new clinical edema back to the fitter, and to the surgeon for a graft.

Scleral lenses for ocular surface disease referrals

Scleral lenses protect the ocular surface by holding a reservoir of non-preserved saline against the cornea and shielding it from lid shear and evaporation. They are a step 3 therapy in TFOS DEWS II, generally used after lubricants, anti-inflammatory therapy, and punctal occlusion, and often alongside them. Outcome data are strongest for exposure, neurotrophic keratopathy, and ocular GVHD, and weaker for dry eye without corneal involvement. Continuation is lower than in irregular cornea, so set expectations.

Scleral lens complications to watch for

Most scleral lens problems are lens-related rather than physiological: broken lenses, deposits, poor wetting, and midday fogging. Physiological complications are less common and include conjunctival changes at the landing zone, corneal edema (higher risk in grafts), hydrops in keratoconus, and, rarely, microbial keratitis. Infection, rejection, and acute hydrops need same-day care; fit-related findings go back to the fitter.

Sources

  1. Schornack MM, Nau CB, Harthan J, Shorter E, Nau A, Fogt J. Survey-based estimation of corneal complications associated with scleral lens wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2023;49(3):89-91. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000972 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  2. Rodriguez-Garcia A, Jimenez-Perez JC, Ruiz-Lozano RE, et al. Scleral lenses and PROSE: indications, complications, and future challenges. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2025;14(3):73-106. doi:10.51329/mehdiophthal1525 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  3. Macedo-de-Araújo RJ, Fadel D, Barnett M. How can we best measure the performance of scleral lenses? Current insights. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2022;14:47-65. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S284632 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  4. Michaud L, van der Worp E, Brazeau D, Warde R, Giasson CJ. Predicting estimates of oxygen transmissibility for scleral lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012;35(6):266-271. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2012.07.004 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  5. Iqbal A, Fisher D, Alonso-Caneiro D, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Central and peripheral scleral lens-induced corneal oedema. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024;44(4):792-800. doi:10.1111/opo.13221 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. Iqbal A, Fisher D, Alonso-Caneiro D, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Regional variations in corneal oedema during open-eye fenestrated scleral lens wear. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025;45(3):618-626. doi:10.1111/opo.13489 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. Bonnet C, Lee A, Shibayama VP, Tseng CH, Deng SX. Clinical outcomes and complications of fluid-filled scleral lens devices for the management of limbal stem cell deficiency. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023;46(1):101528. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2021.101528 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  8. Gimenez-Sanchis I, Palacios-Carmen B, García-Garrigós A, Cantó-Vañó J, Pérez-Ortega AJ, Piñero DP. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography to evaluate the peripheral fitting of scleral contact lenses. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2018;10:103-108. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S164454 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. Harthan JS, Shorter E. Therapeutic uses of scleral contact lenses for ocular surface disease: patient selection and special considerations. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2018;10:65-74. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S144357 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  10. Yin J, Jacobs DS. Long-term outcome of using Prosthetic Replacement of Ocular Surface Ecosystem (PROSE) as a drug delivery system for bevacizumab in the treatment of corneal neovascularization. Ocul Surf. 2019;17(1):134-141. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2018.11.008 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  11. Liao J, Asghari B, Carrasquillo KG. Regression of corneal opacity and neovascularization in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis with the use of prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem (PROSE) treatment. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2022;26:101520. doi:10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101520 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Last updated October 2, 2026. Found an error or a newer study? Let us know and we'll correct the page.