For eye doctors

Scleral lens complications to watch for

What you are likely to see in scleral lens wearers between fitting visits, how often the literature reports it, and which findings need a same-day response.

By the Scleral Lens Team · Updated October 2, 2026 · 15 published sources cited

The short answer

Most scleral lens problems are lens-related rather than physiological: broken lenses, deposits, poor wetting, and midday fogging. Physiological complications are less common and include conjunctival changes at the landing zone, corneal edema (higher risk in grafts), hydrops in keratoconus, and, rarely, microbial keratitis. Infection, rejection, and acute hydrops need same-day care; fit-related findings go back to the fitter.

Key points

  • In a keratoconus series, physiological adverse events occurred in 9.6% of eyes and lens-related events in 55.4%.
  • Microbial keratitis occurred in 0.6% of eyes in that series; risk is higher with immunosuppression and surface disease.
  • Fogging was reported by 58% of habitual wearers in one study and was linked to front-surface nonwetting and reservoir haze, not fit.
  • Healthy corneas show small, reversible thickening under modern high-Dk lenses; grafts swell more.
  • Lid wiper epitheliopathy and meibomian gland disease are common in habitual wearers.

The overall picture

The most detailed rate data come from a retrospective keratoconus series of 157 eyes, limited to eyes successfully fit for at least a year (so not a dropout cohort).[1]

  • Physiological adverse events: 9.6% of eyes. Microbial keratitis 0.6%, phlyctenulosis 0.6%, corneal abrasion 1.3%, contact lens-induced acute red eye 1.3%, corneal infiltrative events 1.3%, pingueculitis 1.3%, and hydrops 3.2%.[1]
  • Lens-related events: 55.4% of eyes. Broken lenses 26.1%, deposits 8.9%, intolerance 7.6%, reservoir fogging 7.0%, handling problems 3.8%, and poor wetting 1.9%.[1]
  • Management was mostly a refit (54.0% of interventions) or patient re-education (29.5%); surgical referral accounted for 6.8%.[1]

In a veteran cohort with a broader mix of diagnoses, 55.0% of patients reported difficulty with wear, most often irritation (20.0%) or mid-day fogging or bubbles (15.8%).[2]

A 2016 review concluded that infections are reported mainly in severely compromised corneas, that hypoxic and inflammatory complications are rarely reported, and that conjunctival prolapse, epithelial bogging, midday fogging, and limbal bearing appear to be unique to scleral lens wear.[3]

Midday fogging

What you see: the patient reports vision that clouds after hours of wear and clears when the lens is removed and refilled. At the slit lamp, look for particulate debris or haze in the reservoir and for nonwetting on the front surface.

Evidence: in a five-site study of 48 habitual wearers, 58% reported fogging. Fit characteristics did not differ between eyes with and without fogging; front-surface nonwetting and diffuse reservoir haze were significantly more common in eyes with fogging.[4] In a three-site study, reservoir depth was not related to fogging from debris behind the lens.[5] Patients with surface disease or incomplete lid closure are at increased risk.[15]

Response: not urgent. Treat lid disease, and send the patient back to the fitter, who can adjust the landing zone, filling solution, surface treatment, or midday refill routine.

Conjunctival and limbal findings

What you see: blanching of conjunctival vessels at the landing zone, a pronounced impression ring or rebound hyperemia after removal, conjunctival staining in one quadrant, tissue drawn under the lens edge (prolapse), or limbal staining from bearing.

Evidence: these are recognized fitting sequelae.[3] A 2026 case series of poorly fitted lenses showed that design changes can allow patients to resume wear, and advised reassessing both fit and underlying disease at scheduled intervals.[13] A case report described intracorneal hemorrhage within 4 hours of application and removal training on the first day of wear, in a patient with long-standing keratoconjunctivitis and keratoconus; the authors frame it as a mechanical complication, a category that includes suction between lens and ocular surface.[14]

Response: route to the fitter. Pingueculitis (1.3% in the keratoconus series) can be treated by you and flagged to the fitter.[1]

Corneal edema and hypoxia

What you see: epithelial microcysts, stromal haze, striae, or a rise in pachymetry after wear.

Evidence in healthy corneas: a meta-analysis of 22 studies (830 eyes) found central corneal thickness increased by 7.93 microns with the lens in place and showed no significant change after removal. Corneal or stromal swelling averaged 0.88%. The authors judged daytime wear of modern high-Dk lenses physiologically safe, with selective monitoring advisable in high-risk patients.[6]

In grafts: post-PK eyes showed about 3% central edema after roughly 6 hours of high-Dk lens wear, greater than healthy corneas and regionally variable.[7] See scleral lenses and corneal transplants.

Response: notify the fitter promptly. For a graft, also notify the corneal surgeon, since edema may reflect endothelial failure or rejection rather than the lens.

Hydrops

Hydrops occurred in 3.2% of eyes in the keratoconus series.[1] A case series described three wearers with PKs for keratoconus more than 30 years old and recurrent ectasia who presented with acute painful focal edema suggestive of hydrops; two of the events followed a scleral lens refit closely enough that the authors suggested some association.[8]

Response: same day. Acute pain with sudden corneal edema needs urgent evaluation.

Microbial keratitis

Rates in published cohorts: 0.6% of eyes in the keratoconus series,[1] and 6% of eyes over up to nine years in a post-PK series.[11]

Risk factors from case series: all three post-PK scleral wearers with MK in one series had concurrent surface disease (keratoconjunctivitis sicca and exposure) and topical or systemic immunosuppression.[9] A series of three Acanthamoeba keratitis cases in keratoconus scleral wearers pointed to large saline volumes, overnight storage in saline, hypoxia, and not rubbing the lens.[10]

Response: same day. Ask about filling solution, storage, tap water exposure, and lens case hygiene, and consider Acanthamoeba in the differential.

Lid disease

In 49 habitual scleral wearers, upper lid wiper epitheliopathy was present in 43% of eyes and lower in 31%. Eyes with surface disease had more meibomian gland obstruction (39% vs 11% with no expressible meibum) and lid margin telangiectasia (61% vs 19%) than eyes with corneal irregularity.[12]

Response: treat as you would in any patient; tell the fitter, since lid disease affects wetting and fogging.

Triage at a glance

Finding Urgency First call
Infiltrate, epithelial defect with pain, or discharge Same day You or a cornea service; notify fitter
Acute corneal edema with pain (possible hydrops) Same day You or a cornea service; notify fitter
Signs of graft rejection Same day Corneal surgeon; notify fitter
Edema or rising pachymetry without pain Prompt Fitter; surgeon if graft
Conjunctival blanching, prolapse, or quadrant staining Routine Fitter
Midday fogging, poor wetting, deposits Routine Fitter; treat lids
Broken or lost lens Routine Fitter (send parameters if you have them)

For the routine division of work between you and the fitter, see co-managing scleral lens patients.

Common questions

Is midday fogging a sign the lens fits badly?

Not necessarily. In a study of 48 habitual wearers, fit characteristics did not differ between eyes with and without fogging; front-surface nonwetting and diffuse reservoir haze did. Fogging was also unrelated to reservoir depth in a separate three-site study. Refer it back to the fitter as a comfort and vision issue, not an emergency.

How common is microbial keratitis in scleral lens wearers?

Published rates come from small cohorts: 0.6% of eyes in a keratoconus series and 6% in a post-keratoplasty series. There is no population-based incidence estimate, and risk depends heavily on the underlying eye and care habits.

Can a scleral lens cause hydrops?

Hydrops occurred in 3.2% of eyes in a keratoconus scleral lens series, and acute hydrops-like episodes have been reported in old PK grafts soon after a refit. Hydrops is also part of the natural history of keratoconus, so these reports don't establish causation.

What is conjunctival prolapse?

Conjunctival tissue drawn into the space under the lens, typically near the limbus. A 2016 review lists it, with epithelial bogging, midday fogging, and limbal bearing, among findings that appear unique to scleral lens wear. It is a fit issue for the fitter.

Keep reading

Co-managing scleral lens patients

The fitter manages the lens: fit, surface response, care regimen, and handling. You continue to manage the underlying disease and everything else in the eye. At your visits, examine the cornea and conjunctiva after lens removal, check acuity in the lens, and measure IOP with the lens out. Average IOP measured after removal has not changed in pooled studies, but pressure during wear is harder to measure and remains an open question for glaucoma and at-risk patients.

Scleral lenses and corneal transplants: the numbers and the research

US surgeons performed 49,427 corneal transplants with US eye bank tissue in 2024, most for failure of the cornea's inner layer. After a transplant, scleral lenses give most people useful vision, often 20/40 or better, but a meaningful share stop wearing them, most often because of handling. Grafted corneas swell more under a scleral lens than healthy ones, and rejection and infection are reported in wearers, though no study has compared wearers with non-wearers. Close follow-up with both your fitter and your cornea surgeon is the consistent advice.

What the fitter sends back

A complete report gives the final lens parameters and material, acuity in the lens, how the lens sits on the eye (central and limbal clearance, landing zone, any blanching or impingement), the corneal and conjunctival findings after wear, the care products and wear schedule, the follow-up plan, and anything the fitter needs you to act on. Expect an initial note after the evaluation and a final report once the fit is complete.

Scleral lens candidate criteria

The strongest predictor of success is a clear visual or therapeutic need, typically an irregular cornea, that the lens meets. The most common reason for stopping is difficulty with insertion and removal. Neurologic comorbidity, poorer vision gain, and ocular surface disease as the indication have each been associated with lower continuation. Few of these are reasons not to refer; most are reasons to flag the issue so the fitter can plan training, devices, or caregiver help.

Sources

  1. Fuller DG, Wang Y. Safety and efficacy of scleral lenses for keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(9):741-748. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001578 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  2. Kanakamedala A, Salazar H, Campagna G, et al. Outcomes of scleral contact lens use in veteran population. Eye Contact Lens. 2020;46(6):348-352. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000671 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  3. Walker MK, Bergmanson JP, Miller WL, Marsack JD, Johnson LA. Complications and fitting challenges associated with scleral contact lenses: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39(2):88-96. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2015.08.003 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  4. Fogt JS, Schornack M, Nau C, Harthan JS, Nau A, Shorter E. Slit lamp findings in scleral lens wearers with and without subjective fogging. Eye Contact Lens. 2025;51(10):439-444. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000001204 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  5. Fogt JS, Schornack M, Shorter E, Harthan JS, Nau A, Nau C. Fluid reservoir characteristics in established scleral lens wear, part I: evaluation of fluid reservoir depth and midday fogging. Eye Contact Lens. 2026;52(6):217-222. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000001272 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. Martinez-Perez C, Sánchez-González MC, Sánchez-González JM. Corneal and intraocular pressure responses to scleral lens wear: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2026;46(4):765-778. doi:10.1007/s44402-026-00110-7 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. Kumar M, Shetty R, Khamar P, Vincent SJ. Scleral lens-induced corneal edema after penetrating keratoplasty. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(9):697-702. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  8. Murillo SE, Shariff A, Lass JH, Szczotka-Flynn LB. Acute corneal edema decades after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus in eyes wearing scleral contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(1):108-114. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. Kawulok ER, Nau CB, Schornack MM. Microbial keratitis associated with penetrating keratoplasty and scleral lens wear: a case series. Eye Contact Lens. 2022;48(5):217-221. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  10. Sticca MP, Carrijo-Carvalho LC, Silva IMB, et al. Acanthamoeba keratitis in patients wearing scleral contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41(3):307-310. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2017.12.004 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  11. Severinsky B, Behrman S, Frucht-Pery J, Solomon A. Scleral contact lenses for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty: long term outcomes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37(3):196-202. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  12. Harthan JS, Nau A, Shorter E, Nau CB, Schornack M, Fogt JS. Presence of eyelid disease in habitual scleral lens wearers. J Clin Med. 2026;15(9):3181. doi:10.3390/jcm15093181 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  13. Nau CB, Nau AC, Fogt JS, Shorter ES, Harthan JS, Schornack MM. Complications of poorly fitted scleral lenses and approaches to continued wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2026;52(10):432-435. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000001306 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  14. Trinh J, Bernhisel AA, Nau CB, Schornack MM. Intracorneal hemorrhage associated with scleral lens wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2025;51(10):450-453. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000001215 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  15. Harthan JS, Shorter E. Therapeutic uses of scleral contact lenses for ocular surface disease: patient selection and special considerations. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2018;10:65-74. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S144357 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Last updated October 2, 2026. Found an error or a newer study? Let us know and we'll correct the page.