For eye doctors

Scleral lenses in glaucoma patients

What is known about intraocular pressure during and after scleral lens wear, how lenses interact with blebs and drainage devices, and a monitoring plan for patients who need both.

By the Scleral Lens Team · Updated October 2, 2026 · 18 published sources cited

The short answer

IOP measured after lens removal is essentially unchanged in most studies, but that number does not describe pressure during wear. Indirect measurements during wear show rises from about 1 to 5 mmHg in healthy eyes, with small reversible optic nerve changes, and there are no long-term outcome data in glaucoma. For patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, rely on structural and functional monitoring, coordinate with the fitter on landing zone design, and expect blebs and anterior tubes to need customized lenses.

Key points

  • A meta-analysis of 22 studies (830 eyes) found no significant IOP change after lens removal.
  • During wear, healthy-eye studies report rises of about 1 to 5 mmHg depending on the instrument, and the instruments often disagree.
  • Small reversible rim and RNFL thinning during wear has been measured in healthy and keratoconic eyes.
  • After bleb-forming surgery, 51% of eyes in one series wore any contact lens successfully for a year; non-impression scleral lenses fared worst.
  • Use drops before or after wear, with at least 10 minutes before lens application, and avoid BAK where alternatives exist.

Why there is a concern

A scleral lens rests on conjunctiva over the sclera, near the outflow pathway. The hypothesis is that landing zone pressure compresses episcleral veins or deforms tissue around Schlemm’s canal and raises outflow resistance.[4] A 2026 review adds evidence of increased anterior chamber volume, a narrower iridocorneal angle, and Schlemm’s canal compression during wear, and notes that many studies measured too early, before maximum compression after more than 4 hours of wear.[2]

The practical problem is measurement. With the cornea covered, standard tonometry is impossible during wear, so studies have used scleral pneumotonometry, transpalpebral, Schiotz, or peripheral rebound tonometry, or a large central fenestration, and many have studied only healthy eyes over short periods.[1]

What the IOP studies show

After removal, on the cornea:

  • A meta-analysis of 22 studies (830 eyes) found no significant IOP change after removal (mean difference 0.38 mmHg, p = 0.27), with high heterogeneity (I² = 78%).[3]
  • In 32 new wearers, Goldmann IOP after removal changed by 1 mmHg or less on average over six months.[5]
  • In 91 eyes followed for 12 months in 16.4 mm lenses, IOP fluctuations after removal stayed below 1 mmHg on average.[6]
  • In 60 Chinese participants over three months, mean IOP varied by less than 0.3 mmHg, but 10% of eyes showed a rise of 2 mmHg or more on two consecutive visits, including the last.[7]
  • In 17 keratoconus patients over three months, mean IOP rose 0.33 mmHg (not significant); temporal angle narrowing was significant in women, older age was associated with a narrower temporal angle, and the authors advise watching for temporal narrowing.[8]

During wear, by indirect methods (healthy eyes unless stated):

  • Twenty-nine adults in 15 mm lenses for 2 hours: no IOP change after removal and no change in peripheral pneumotonometry during wear.[4]
  • Fifty young adults, fenestrated lens for 1 to 2 minutes: rebound IOP rose in 96%, by 3.8 mmHg on average in those participants, and returned to near baseline after removal. The authors could not say whether the rise was real or artifact.[9]
  • Twenty-six adults over 6 hours, fellow eye as control: Icare IOP rose 2 mmHg in the lens eye; a transpalpebral tonometer showed no meaningful change and correlated poorly with Icare.[10]
  • Randomized, 15.6 mm and 18.0 mm lenses: scleral IOP rose 1.16 and 1.37 mmHg at 2.5 hours, with no difference by size and no change in corneal IOP after removal.[11]
  • Randomized crossover, 31 adults, 8 hours: transpalpebral IOP rose from 11 to 16 mmHg after application, stayed there through wear, and returned to baseline after removal. The two tonometers used agreed poorly.[12]

The 2026 review reads this body of work as a moderate rise during wear, under 5 mmHg, unlikely to harm a healthy nerve but with possible long-term risk for patients with glaucoma or at risk of it. It concludes that it is too early to know.[2]

Optic nerve findings

  • Healthy adults over 6 hours: minimum rim width thinned in both the lens eye and the control eye, and not significantly more with the lens.[10]
  • Healthy young adults over 8 hours: small peripapillary RNFL thinning (110 to 107 µm) during wear that reversed after removal.[12]
  • Keratoconus patients after 6 hours in optimized lenses: Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width thinned by 10.5 µm, compared with 4.8 µm without lenses. The authors advise close optic nerve monitoring for patients at risk.[13]

A 2023 review concludes that ongoing assessment of optic nerve structure and function is advisable in patients at risk for glaucoma who need scleral lenses.[1]

Glaucoma is common in therapeutic fits

At one PROSE center, 24 of 281 patients fitted (8.5%) had a glaucoma diagnosis and 17 (6.0%) were glaucoma suspects; the authors describe this as higher than the general population.[14] Many of these patients have ocular surface disease and use chronic topical medication, which matters for drop choice below.

Blebs and drainage devices

  • Outcomes after bleb-forming surgery: a 15-year academic series found 20 of 39 eyes (51%) wore any contact lens successfully for at least a year, with no difference between trabeculectomy and drainage device eyes. Rigid gas permeable lenses were more common among successes; only 1 of 9 eyes in non-impression-fitted scleral lenses succeeded, while 4 of 5 eyes in impression-fitted scleral lenses did. Complications in successful wearers included one failed bleb and one case of corneal edema. The authors note that a bleb, tube, or patch graft at the limbus makes fitting harder and could raise the risk of corneal ulcer and blebitis.[15]
  • PROSE after incisional surgery: of 5 eyes with prior incisional glaucoma surgery at one center, 3 were fitted successfully.[14]
  • Design strategies: a 2025 review describes reducing lens diameter, notches, focal vaults or relief zones over the tube, toric or impression-based landing zones, and, at the surgical stage, pars plana or posterior tube placement and patch grafts that make later lens fitting easier. It lists tube compression, conjunctival thinning and erosion over the tube, and bleb erosion, leakage, or reduced filtration among the risks.[16]

If a patient may need scleral lenses later, it is worth raising with the glaucoma surgeon before surgery, since tube position and patch graft choice affect what the fitter can do.[16]

Drops

A review of therapeutic scleral lens practice advises using topical prescription medications before or after lens wear, waiting at least 10 minutes before applying the lens, and eliminating benzalkonium chloride-preserved medications in surface disease where alternatives exist, particularly glaucoma drops.[17] BAK is cytotoxic to corneal and conjunctival epithelium, with effects that are more problematic with chronic use.[18] Tell the fitter about any change in glaucoma medication; a new preservative can look like a lens problem.

A monitoring plan for patients who need both

  1. Before the fit: baseline OCT of the nerve and RNFL, visual field, IOP, and gonioscopy. Send the fitter the diagnosis, target pressure, surgical history, and the location of any bleb or tube.
  2. During adaptation: IOP after removal at your usual visits, plus a repeat OCT once the patient is in full-time wear.
  3. Ongoing: structural and functional testing at the interval you would use for that patient’s glaucoma stage, with a lower threshold to shorten it. A stable post-removal IOP is reassuring about the eye without the lens, not about pressure during wear.[1]
  4. If progression appears: discuss with the fitter whether the landing zone can be redesigned or wear time reduced, and weigh the lens’s visual benefit against the alternatives.

Common questions

Is glaucoma a contraindication to scleral lenses?

Not an absolute one. A 2025 review calls pre-existing glaucoma a possible relative contraindication because of the theoretical risk from landing zone compression. In practice the decision weighs visual need against how advanced and how well controlled the glaucoma is, with closer structural and functional monitoring if lenses go ahead.

Can I measure IOP through the scleral lens?

Not with standard corneal tonometry. Studies have used scleral pneumotonometry, transpalpebral tonometry, rebound tonometry on the peripheral cornea, or a central fenestration, and results vary with the method. Transpalpebral and other instruments agreed poorly in two studies. Measure IOP after removal as usual, and use optic nerve imaging and fields to judge whether wear is affecting the nerve.

Does lens diameter matter for IOP?

In a randomized study of healthy adults, scleral pneumotonometry rose similarly with 15.6 mm and 18.0 mm lenses (about 1.2 and 1.4 mmHg at 2.5 hours), with no significant difference between sizes. A 2025 review suggests a larger landing area may distribute lens weight more evenly, but that has not been tested against glaucoma outcomes.

My patient has a tube shunt. Can they wear a scleral lens?

Sometimes, with a customized lens and close co-management. Reported strategies include a smaller diameter, a notch or focal vault over the tube, and impression-based designs. Risks described include tube compression and conjunctival erosion over the tube. Tell the fitter where the tube and plate sit before the fit.

Keep reading

Co-managing scleral lens patients

The fitter manages the lens: fit, surface response, care regimen, and handling. You continue to manage the underlying disease and everything else in the eye. At your visits, examine the cornea and conjunctiva after lens removal, check acuity in the lens, and measure IOP with the lens out. Average IOP measured after removal has not changed in pooled studies, but pressure during wear is harder to measure and remains an open question for glaucoma and at-risk patients.

Scleral lens candidate criteria

The strongest predictor of success is a clear visual or therapeutic need, typically an irregular cornea, that the lens meets. The most common reason for stopping is difficulty with insertion and removal. Neurologic comorbidity, poorer vision gain, and ocular surface disease as the indication have each been associated with lower continuation. Few of these are reasons not to refer; most are reasons to flag the issue so the fitter can plan training, devices, or caregiver help.

Scleral lens referral checklist

Send the reason for referral and the goal, serial topography or tomography, a current refraction with BCVA, the contact lens history and why each lens failed, surgical reports (especially keratoplasty and glaucoma surgery), current medications with their preservatives, and relevant systemic history. Graft patients should come with whatever endothelial and pachymetry data exist. Fitting typically takes several visits, so set that expectation with the patient.

Limbal and conjunctival findings in scleral lens wearers

A scleral lens bears on the conjunctiva, so some landing zone change is expected: a faint impression ring after removal usually fades within hours. Sectoral or circumferential blanching during wear with rebound hyperemia after removal, edge impingement, quadrant staining, or limbal staining point to a fit problem that the fitter can usually correct with design changes. Imaging studies show measurable conjunctival vascular and thickness changes under the landing zone, of uncertain long-term significance. Limbal compromise in eyes with limbal stem cell deficiency needs closer attention.

Sources

  1. Schornack MM, Vincent SJ, Walker MK. Anatomical and physiological considerations in scleral lens wear: intraocular pressure. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023;46(1):101535. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2021.101535 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  2. Michaud L. The impact of scleral lenses on intraocular pressure. J Clin Med. 2026;15(4):1635. doi:10.3390/jcm15041635 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  3. Martinez-Perez C, Sánchez-González MC, Sánchez-González JM. Corneal and intraocular pressure responses to scleral lens wear: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2026;46(4):765-778. doi:10.1007/s44402-026-00110-7 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  4. Nau CB, Schornack MM, McLaren JW, Sit AJ. Intraocular pressure after 2 hours of small-diameter scleral lens wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2016;42(6):350-353. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000214 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  5. Kramer EG, Vincent SJ. Intraocular pressure changes in neophyte scleral lens wearers: a prospective study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(6):609-612. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.05.010 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. Macedo-de-Araújo RJ, Seco RM, González-Méijome JM. Prospective assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure after scleral lens wear: a 12-month follow-up study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023;46(6):102067. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2023.102067 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. Yang M, Wang F, Xu A, et al. Intraocular pressure following long-term scleral lens wear in Chinese eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2025;48(6):102476. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2025.102476 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  8. Esmaili-Badrabadi P, Nabovati P, Ahmad MA, et al. Impact of a three-month period of mini-scleral lens usage on intraocular pressure and the anterior chamber angle in patients with keratoconus. Int J Ophthalmol. 2026;19(8):1510-1517. doi:10.18240/ijo.2026.08.08 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. Cheung SY, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. The impact of short-term fenestrated scleral lens wear on intraocular pressure. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(6):585-588. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.02.003 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  10. Walker MK, Pardon LP, Redfern R, Patel N. IOP and optic nerve head morphology during scleral lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(9):661-668. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001567 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  11. Litvin TV, Tse V, Chung L, et al. Effect of scleral contact lens size and duration of wear on intraocular pressure. Eye Contact Lens. 2023;49(9):e357-e363. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000001012 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  12. Dhungel P, Alanazi MK, Caroline P, Yudcovitch L, Liu M. Short-term impact of scleral lens wear on intraocular pressure and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Life (Basel). 2026;16(7):1094. doi:10.3390/life16071094 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  13. Michaud L, Balourdet S, Samaha D. Variation of Bruch's membrane opening in response to intraocular pressure change during scleral lens wear, in a population with keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025;45(2):405-415. doi:10.1111/opo.13431 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  14. Duong AT, Ertel MK, Van Tassel SH. Glaucoma prevalence and glaucoma surgical considerations in prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem device use. Eye Contact Lens. 2022;48(2):69-72. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000846 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  15. Tang SJ, Do T, Barnett M, Pederson K, Lim MC. The use of contact lenses in patients with prior bleb-forming glaucoma surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025;25(1):269. doi:10.1186/s12886-025-04103-x pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  16. Rodriguez-Garcia A, Jimenez-Perez JC, Ruiz-Lozano RE, et al. Scleral lenses and PROSE: indications, complications, and future challenges. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2025;14(3):73-106. doi:10.51329/mehdiophthal1525 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  17. Harthan JS, Shorter E. Therapeutic uses of scleral contact lenses for ocular surface disease: patient selection and special considerations. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2018;10:65-74. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S144357 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  18. Goldstein MH, Silva FQ, Blender N, Tran T, Vantipalli S. Ocular benzalkonium chloride exposure: problems and solutions. Eye (Lond). 2022;36(2):361-368. doi:10.1038/s41433-021-01668-x pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Last updated October 2, 2026. Found an error or a newer study? Let us know and we'll correct the page.