Research

Scleral lens complications: what the research shows

What can go wrong with scleral lenses, how often studies find it, and which eyes are most at risk. Serious problems are uncommon in the published research, but the evidence is thinner than it should be.

By the Scleral Lens Team · Updated October 2, 2026 · 24 published sources cited

The short answer

Serious complications from scleral lenses appear to be uncommon in published studies, but they do happen. Infections have been reported, often in eyes that were already fragile or where lens care slipped. The lens slightly reduces oxygen to the cornea, which matters most for eyes with a weakened inner corneal layer, such as some after a transplant. Studies on eye pressure are mixed and mostly short-term. Day-to-day problems such as broken lenses, deposits, and fogging are far more common than medical ones.

Key points

  • In one keratoconus study, physiological adverse events occurred in 9.6% of eyes.
  • Infection is rare in studies but reported, including Acanthamoeba.
  • Healthy corneas swell slightly under scleral lenses; grafted corneas swell more.
  • Eye pressure studies are short and mixed; a 2026 meta-analysis found no significant change after removal.
  • Lens problems such as breakage and fogging are the most common issues.

The short version of the evidence

A 2016 review of the published literature found reports of infection with scleral lenses, often in severely compromised corneas, while oxygen-related and inflammatory complications were rarely reported. It also noted problems unique to scleral lenses, such as the conjunctiva bulging into the space under the lens, swelling of the corneal surface layer, midday fogging, and the lens edge pressing on the limbus.[2]

The best single snapshot comes from a US retrospective study of 157 keratoconus eyes that had worn scleral lenses successfully for at least a year:[1]

Event Share of eyes[1]
Any physiological adverse event 9.6%
Hydrops (sudden swelling from a break in the cornea’s inner layer, part of keratoconus itself) 3.2%
Corneal abrasion 1.3%
Contact lens acute red eye 1.3%
Corneal infiltrates (inflammation spots) 1.3%
Pingueculitis (inflamed bump on the white of the eye) 1.3%
Microbial keratitis (corneal infection) 0.6%
Phlyctenulosis (an inflammatory nodule) 0.6%
Any lens-related event 55.4%
Broken lens 26.1%
Deposits 8.9%
Lens intolerance 7.6%
Reservoir fogging 7.0%
Handling problems 3.8%
Poor wetting 1.9%

Two caveats. The study only included eyes that were successfully fitted, and it can’t show which events were caused by the lens rather than by keratoconus. Still, the pattern is clear: problems with the lens itself were far more common than problems with the eye.

In a prospective one-year study of 95 wearers, none of the 26 people who stopped did so because of an adverse event.[3]

Infection

Microbial keratitis, an infection of the cornea, is the most serious risk of any contact lens. Scleral lenses aren’t exempt. Large studies of how often it happens in scleral wearers don’t exist yet; what’s published is mostly case reports and small series.

  • In the 157-eye keratoconus study, microbial keratitis occurred in 0.6% of eyes.[1]
  • In a series of 31 people wearing scleral lenses after a full-thickness transplant, followed for an average of 5.2 years, two eyes (6%) had an episode of microbial keratitis.[8]
  • Acanthamoeba keratitis, a serious corneal infection caused by an amoeba, was reported in three scleral lens wearers with keratoconus. The authors listed possible contributing factors: reduced oxygen and tear exchange, the large volumes of saline used, storing lenses overnight in saline instead of disinfecting solution, not rubbing the lens during cleaning, and the reservoir as a space where organisms could multiply. They recommended sterile, preferably single-use saline, rubbing the lens, cleaning the plunger, and fresh disinfecting solution each night without topping off.[4]
  • Three infections in grafted eyes were described in people who also had dry eye or exposure problems and were taking immune-suppressing medicines. The authors noted that several factors, including the lens, may have contributed.[5]
  • Case reports describe an infection after poor lens care in a man with neurotrophic keratitis[6] and a microsporidial and bacterial infection in a woman with Sjögren’s syndrome and ocular cicatricial pemphigoid.[7]

The common thread: infections tend to occur in eyes that are already vulnerable, and often alongside a gap in lens care. That’s why the care routine matters. See the daily routine guide.

Corneal swelling and oxygen

A scleral lens and its fluid layer reduce the oxygen reaching the cornea, and the cornea responds by swelling slightly.

  • In healthy corneas, a combined modeling and clinical study found that modern lenses with typical fits cause less than 2% swelling during open-eye wear. Closed-eye wear appeared clinically unsafe.[9]
  • The thicker the fluid layer, the more swelling, up to a point. In 10 healthy volunteers, average swelling rose from 0.69% with a thin reservoir to 2.11% with a thick one, leveling off at about 600 microns.[10]
  • A 2026 meta-analysis of 22 studies (830 eyes) found a small increase in central corneal thickness while the lens was on, about 8 microns, and no significant change after removal.[20]

The concern is greater for eyes whose corneal pump, the inner endothelial layer, is already weak:

  • After full-thickness transplant, 9 eyes swelled about three times as much as healthy eyes after a few hours of wear, with more swelling toward the graft edge.[11]
  • At one PROSE center, 6 of the 8 eyes that failed treatment had worsening corneal swelling, all in eyes with risk factors for a low endothelial cell count.[13]
  • A three-center study of 31 grafted eyes, 90% originally grafted for keratoconus, found lower central endothelial cell density weakly linked to more swelling during lens wear, though all corneas stayed clear.[12]
  • Three case reports describe sudden, painful corneal swelling in scleral wearers whose transplants were more than 30 years old. Similar events can happen in old grafts without lenses, but the timing after refitting suggested a possible link.[14]

Graft rejection is also a consideration. In the 31-patient post-transplant series, 30% of eyes had at least one rejection episode during follow-up.[8] That study had no comparison group, so it can’t show whether lens wear changed the risk.

Eye pressure

Researchers have asked whether the landing zone, pressing on the tissue over the eye’s drainage system, could raise pressure inside the eye. Measuring eye pressure with a lens covering the cornea is technically difficult, and a 2023 review called the results conflicting, with most studies short-term and in healthy eyes.[15]

  • 2 hours, 29 healthy eyes: no difference in pressure after lens removal.[16]
  • First 6 months, 32 new wearers: a slight upward trend of 1 mmHg or less after removal, not statistically or clinically significant.[17]
  • 6 hours, 26 healthy adults: one instrument measured an average rise of 2 mmHg during wear; the authors concluded the effect on pressure and the optic nerve was minimal.[18]
  • 1 to 2 minutes, 50 young adults: pressure rose in 96% right after insertion, by under 4 mmHg on average, returning to near baseline on removal. The authors couldn’t tell whether this was a true rise or a measurement artifact.[19]
  • 2026 meta-analysis: no significant change in pressure measured after lens removal.[20]

The review authors advise ongoing monitoring of optic nerve structure and function in people at risk for glaucoma who need scleral lenses.[15]

Fogging and other everyday problems

Midday fogging, debris clouding the fluid layer, is the most common complaint. Studies have reported it in 26% to 46% of wearers.[21] In a survey where fitters described their most recent established scleral patient, 25.8% of those patients reported it. Fogging was more common in people who also reported redness or irritation, which suggests inflammation may play a part.[23]

In the study of 120 veterans, 55.0% had some difficulty with wear, most often eye irritation (20.0%) and midday fogging or bubbles (15.8%).[24]

For the benefits side of the picture, see scleral lens outcomes research.

Common questions

Are scleral lenses safe?

For most wearers, published studies report few serious problems, and modern high-oxygen materials have reduced many of the complications older scleral lenses caused. But no contact lens is risk-free. Infections have been reported, and some eyes, such as those with corneal transplants, need especially close monitoring.

Can scleral lenses cause an eye infection?

Yes, though published reports are uncommon. In a keratoconus study of 157 eyes, microbial keratitis occurred in 0.6%. Case reports describe infections, including Acanthamoeba, often linked to fragile corneas or to lapses in lens care such as non-sterile saline or not rubbing the lens clean.

Do scleral lenses raise eye pressure?

The evidence is mixed. Several short studies in healthy eyes found no meaningful change after the lens was removed, while others measured small rises during wear. Measuring pressure with the lens on is technically hard. If you have glaucoma or are at risk for it, ask how your optic nerve will be monitored.

Can scleral lenses damage a corneal transplant?

Grafted corneas can swell more under a scleral lens than healthy ones, and case reports describe problems in some long-standing grafts. Many people with transplants wear scleral lenses successfully, but they need careful fitting and regular checks of the graft.

What's the most common problem scleral wearers have?

Everyday lens problems rather than medical ones. In a keratoconus study, broken lenses affected 26.1% of eyes, deposits 8.9%, and reservoir fogging 7.0%. Surveys and reviews put midday fogging at roughly a quarter to nearly half of wearers.

Keep reading

Scleral lens outcomes: what the research shows

Studies consistently find that scleral lenses improve vision for people with irregular corneas, often by a large margin, and improve how people rate their daily visual functioning. But a meaningful share stop wearing them: between about a fifth and a third in the studies below, which followed people for six months to about three years, most often because inserting and removing the lenses is hard. Most of the evidence comes from single clinics and retrospective chart reviews, so the figures are a guide, not a promise.

Scleral lens wearer statistics

No registry counts how many people wear scleral lenses, so the best data come from surveys of fitters and from large practices. They agree on the main point: most scleral lenses are prescribed for irregular corneas such as keratoconus, a smaller share for ocular surface disease, and very few for ordinary prescriptions. Scleral lenses are a growing part of rigid lens fitting worldwide, and more practitioners are fitting them than a decade ago.

How scleral lenses work

A scleral lens rests on the white of the eye and arches over the cornea like a dome. The space under the dome is filled with saline before insertion. Light passes through the smooth lens and the even fluid layer, which masks the cornea's irregularities, while the fluid keeps the cornea bathed. Oxygen reaches the cornea through the lens material and the fluid, which is why fitters use highly oxygen-permeable materials and avoid more clearance than the eye needs.

Sources

  1. Fuller DG, Wang Y. Safety and efficacy of scleral lenses for keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(9):741-748. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001578 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  2. Walker MK, Bergmanson JP, Miller WL, Marsack JD, Johnson LA. Complications and fitting challenges associated with scleral contact lenses: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39(2):88-96. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2015.08.003 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  3. Macedo-de-Araújo RJ, van der Worp E, González-Méijome JM. A one-year prospective study on scleral lens wear success. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(6):553-561. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2019.10.140 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  4. Sticca MP, Carrijo-Carvalho LC, Silva IMB, et al. Acanthamoeba keratitis in patients wearing scleral contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41(3):307-310. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2017.12.004 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  5. Kawulok ER, Nau CB, Schornack MM. Microbial keratitis associated with penetrating keratoplasty and scleral lens wear: a case series. Eye Contact Lens. 2022;48(5):217-221. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000895 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. Zimmerman AB, Marks A. Microbial keratitis secondary to unintended poor compliance with scleral gas-permeable contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2014;40(1):e1-4. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e318273420f pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. Fernandes M, Sharma S. Polymicrobial and microsporidial keratitis in a patient using Boston scleral contact lens for Sjogren's syndrome and ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36(2):95-97. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2012.10.082 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  8. Severinsky B, Behrman S, Frucht-Pery J, Solomon A. Scleral contact lenses for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty: long term outcomes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37(3):196-202. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2013.11.001 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. Kim YH, Tan B, Lin MC, Radke CJ. Central corneal edema with scleral-lens wear. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(11):1305-1315. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1500610 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  10. Fisher D, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Fluid reservoir thickness and corneal edema during open-eye scleral lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(9):683-689. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001558 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  11. Kumar M, Shetty R, Khamar P, Vincent SJ. Scleral lens-induced corneal edema after penetrating keratoplasty. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(9):697-702. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001571 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  12. Szczotka-Flynn L, Schornack M, Benetz BA, et al. Influence of corneal endothelial cell density after penetrating keratoplasty on contact lens induced corneal swelling. Optom Vis Sci. 2026;103(6):e70080. doi:10.1002/ovs2.70080 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  13. Schear MJ, Ibrahim K, Winokur J, Busuioc C, Udell I, Steiner A. Treatment limitations with PROSE (prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem): one center's experience. Eye Contact Lens. 2019;45(5):315-317. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000610 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  14. Murillo SE, Shariff A, Lass JH, Szczotka-Flynn LB. Acute corneal edema decades after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus in eyes wearing scleral contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(1):108-114. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.10.008 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  15. Schornack MM, Vincent SJ, Walker MK. Anatomical and physiological considerations in scleral lens wear: intraocular pressure. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023;46(1):101535. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2021.101535 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  16. Nau CB, Schornack MM, McLaren JW, Sit AJ. Intraocular pressure after 2 hours of small-diameter scleral lens wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2016;42(6):350-353. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000214 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  17. Kramer EG, Vincent SJ. Intraocular pressure changes in neophyte scleral lens wearers: a prospective study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(6):609-612. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.05.010 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  18. Walker MK, Pardon LP, Redfern R, Patel N. IOP and optic nerve head morphology during scleral lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(9):661-668. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001567 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  19. Cheung SY, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. The impact of short-term fenestrated scleral lens wear on intraocular pressure. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(6):585-588. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.02.003 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  20. Martinez-Perez C, Sánchez-González MC, Sánchez-González JM. Corneal and intraocular pressure responses to scleral lens wear: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2026;46(4):765-778. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  21. Fogt JS. Midday fogging of scleral contact lenses: current perspectives. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2021;13:209-219. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S284634 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  22. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Contact Lens Risks. Content current as of September 4, 2018. fda.gov
  23. Schornack MM, Fogt J, Harthan J, et al. Factors associated with patient-reported midday fogging in established scleral lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(6):602-608. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.03.005 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  24. Kanakamedala A, Salazar H, Campagna G, et al. Outcomes of scleral contact lens use in veteran population. Eye Contact Lens. 2020;46(6):348-352. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000671 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Last updated October 2, 2026. Found an error or a newer study? Let us know and we'll correct the page.